The First Presidential Debate

I was counting Obama's stammers, pauses, "umm's", etc. throughout (I got a total of 165), and they were occuring at an increasing rate as the debate wore on, getting quite obvious at the end.

As to the Kissinger statement, I think it might have been another attempt by Obama to get a rise out of McCain (as he tried earlier with the litany of things McCain had been "wrong" about). Much to McCain's credit, he kept his cool despite the taunts.

Overall, I think Obama was clearly trying to do two things: Tie McCain to Bush and blame businesses for all economic problems. The first point is absurd, and the second reflects Obama's hostility toward capitalism.

Has anyone noticed that Obama knows nothing about how money is made? He pictures the capitalist as a misanthropic Scrooge McDuck, sitting on piles of cash while laughing at the misery of the peasants. (Even McDuck knew better than that; see 1967's "Scrooge McDuck and Money". Obama would be well-advised to watch it.)

Anyway, economic prosperity depends on business doing well, expanding its efforts, making more capital investment, hiring more workers, finding new markets around the world. Prosperity does not come from the government, which is confiscatory at its foundation.

A glaring ignorance for someone who wants to be the leader of the nation with the world's largest economy. (Note that I did not say "leader of the world's biggest economy"--I don't think that is or should be the President's job.)

Scott

Global Talent Shortage?

I've read that some feel there's a shortage of talent in the global labor pool.

Here in the US, I see the problem differently: talent is plentiful; the ability to identify, develop, and retain it is what's lacking.

Companies' recruiting efforts are failing to bring in genuine talent. Instead, it's an automated game of word-match, trying to reduce sophisticated skill sets to a handful of keywords. For commodity jobs, this might work, but for the genuinely outstanding talent, it's doomed to failure.

Retention remains problematic not through lack of talented workers, but effective leaders. In this downturn, we'll see whether companies are serious about "people are our most valuable asset"--I'll bet many of these "assets" are dispensed like excess office furniture. This shows a serious lack of recognition of employees' value.

Sarah Palin and Wolf Population Control In Alaska

Just for the record, I'm a hunter, a wolf supporter, and a wildlife lover. I'm also someone who will vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin, and I encourage everyone to do so.

I have learned that one of the most important factors to consider in discussing any wildlife issue is not to take our personal experiences and apply them to the rest of the world.

For example, until a few months ago, I had never visited Alaska, though I'd always wanted to.

Once I finally got there, I was impressed by a few things. For one, it's unimaginably huge (and this is coming from a guy who lives in Texas). It's also unimaginably remote. For most towns, there are no malls, no Wal-Marts, no Domino's Pizza delivery, not even any paved roads (as an example, Eagle, Alaska, a relatively major town with a population of 133, has one road in and out of town, it's unpaved, a single lane, and it's more than 100 miles to the next town, which is even smaller). Most of what you and I take for granted just isn't available to many Alaskans.

For another thing, virtually every person who lives in Alaska comes face-to-face with wildlife in ways the rest of us can't imagine--and for everyone concerned, it's not just an academic exercise. People who hunt moose do so for food; without killing one or two, it means no meat for the whole winter. The winters are long. And dark. And very, very cold.

Personally, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of killing wolves. But I understand that predator-prey relationships are important. Wolves in particular aren't just beautiful, noble hunters--they compete with people for food. And they're very good at it, too; their large numbers are evidence of that. Which is why they have to be controlled.

Palin's support of predator control isn't some arbitrary, cruel, bloodthirsty decision--it's one that is specifically intended to make sure that all wildlife thrives, and just as importantly, that Alaska's citizens (including the Native Americans) have a good opportunity to feed their families, especially through the winter. What is wrong with that?

If wolves are hunted from the air, it's because it's the only way to get at them. Again, most of Alaska has no roads at all. (Think of people who go "flightseeing" in Alaska--part of the reason to tour by airplane is for the views, but a big part is because that's the only way to get there. You can't drive; you can't take a boat; it's too hard to walk--things like mountains, rivers, and glaciers get in the way.)

Finally, let me dispel some common misconceptions about hunting. For one, hunters contribute more to wildlife conservation than any other group. Any other group. For another, people who hunt have more respect for the animals they harvest than you imagine. I have great respect for the animals I've hunted; in fact, getting started in hunting taught me more about wildlife than anything else I'd ever done. It sounds paradoxical, but I have a higher regard for deer now, after having killed a few, than I did a few years ago. (This is something that most non-hunters simply cannot understand, but it's true.)

Those of you who've eaten meat all your lives but never done the killing yourself have no idea what happens to put your meals in front of you. Let me tell you, it isn't pretty. Deliberately going out to kill an independent, beautiful animal is not an easy thing to do. Watching it die is not pleasurable. (Did you know that animals die with their eyes open? It's not like they're going to sleep. They kick, and thrash, and bleed. It's very sad, and I don't enjoy it one bit.) The first time you see--and smell--an animal cut open and butchered, it'll make you want to throw up (it did for me). But these things have to happen--someone has to do it--unless you want to eat rabbit food the rest of your life (or be a hypocrite).

Please don't impose the "morality" of your comfortable consumerism on everyone--they may not have that choice. For many Alaskans, wildlife management is literally life-or-death. And not hunting--killing a moose or caribou--means looking your kids in the eye and telling them there's nothing to eat. How would that make you feel?

Vote McCain/Palin.

Scott

P.S. Here's a link to my Alaska photo album, from earlier this year, including lots of wildlife photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/srlucado/sets/72157605530077351/

Here are some photos of local Texas wildlife (mostly deer):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/srlucado/sets/72157603508893223/

While We Await the Election, the World Doesn't Wait

While our election sells a lot of newspapers (relatively speaking) and keeps a lot of pundits busy, it certainly doesn't stop world events from moving forward.

The rest of the world is not waiting with bated breath to see whether The Light-Bringer or The Maverick wins the White House; they really don't care.

Islamofascists want us all dead anyway; Russia wants hemispherical domination anyway; China is an environmental, human-rights, and economic mess anyway; Europe is sinking into oblivion anyway; the Middle East will be an unholy mess (as it's always been) anyway.

One thing's for sure...whoever wins the election (and I pray it'll be McCain), he'd better be prepared from day one to deal with a complex, dangerous world that's got flashpoints simmering darn near everywhere. Our next president had better be ready to *do something* (or a lot of somethings) - not give speeches, not take opinion polls, not look for someone to blame, not invent meaningless slogans, not count on personal charisma. The world won't wait.

Scott

Obama Spent $8M in Florida; Trails More Now Than Before

Wow, good use of all those donations to Obama’s campaign.

Out of their pockets--right down the drain in a futile effort.

Sort of what the whole country could expect to happen to their tax dollars under an Obama administration.

Scott

Being Right Should Count For Something

Being right should count for something...but not in the liberal world. Because if being right counts for something, so does being wrong. And people like Joe Biden have been wrong on so many things (and continue to be). But that doesn’t stop them, slow them down, or even shut them up.

So, what does matter? Intent (real or imputed), of course.

Bush’s intention (according to liberals) was “blood for oil.” Bad boy. “War criminal.”

How about Obama’s intentions? Community organizer. Good boy. The fact that the community remains disorganized? Irrelevant. That the Annenberg’s $100,000,000 produced no improvement? Irrelevant. Voting “present”? Irrelevant. He means so well, don’t you see?

Scott

McCain's Convention Speech

I thought his speech was okay. McCain isn’t a great speaker, but his sincerity is quite evident, and that’s worth a lot, at least to me.

I worry that presidential elections will hinge too much on who sounds better in front of a teleprompter, a sort of American Idol empty-headedness (it’s already true of one party).

We need an emotional connection to our leaders, no doubt. In fact, I believe that an emotional connection is necessary for any successful undertaking. But on its own, it’s not enough.

McCain’s emotional connection is way, way different from Obama’s. Obama acts born to it; McCain survived the crucible, and it has left its marks on him, quite literally. His discussion of imprisonment was quite moving.

To sum up, Obama is the comfort of a down pillow. McCain is the security of a good sword, tempered to be strong, flexible--and respected.

That’s what I think came across in his speech.

Scott

Outcome of the Republican Convention

Here’s the way I see it, from my vantage point deep in Flyover Country.

At the start of the Democratic convention, their party was about equally divided between very enthusiastic and very unsure.

At the end of their convention, they were in the same position. Maybe Obama rallied them a bit, but not convincingly so.

For the Republicans, they started their convention almost universally nervous. Not a lot of great enthusiasm for McCain (nor would they have had it for anyone, really), but a perfunctory sense that “We have to keep the tax-and-spend socialist out of the White House.” (Good enough for me, anyway.)

But at the end...well, that’s a different story. Now not only is the party energized, but there’s a lot of man-on-the-street enthusiasm for Palin, and McCain looks like he’s riding her coattails at the moment (who’d’a thunk it?).

As I said elsewhere, Palin has given America a yardstick with which to measure Obama, and he looks pretty lame by comparison. It’s as though the Dems have two VP candidates, with plenty of room at the top (if you know what I mean).

I say the conventions score big for the Republicans. Let’s hope they can keep the jump-started momentum going, and build on it.

Scott

Political Contributions vs. Expenditures

McCain's campaign took in $47 million in August.

I suspect that Republican donations will increase now that the ticket is defined.

Of course, that’s only half the issue, the other half being where the money goes.

Obama continues to rake it in, but he’s burning it at a rate that would be the envy of a late-90’s internet startup. (Probably a good indication of what he’d do with tax dollars, eh?) Come October, he may wish he’d hung on to a few million of those dollars.

I hope that McCain/Palin make the most of the $47 million.

Scott

Right-wing Nutcases?

(re: Hurricane Gustav & the RNC)

Apparently anyone who shows a Democrat in a moment of candor is a “nutcase”.

I guess they’re establishing precedent for sending all conservatives to re-education camps.

Left unsaid is the obvious fact that Democrats love votes, but don’t have much concern for actual voters.

Of course, since so many Chicago Democrat voters are already dead, this may explain it; perhaps the Democratic strategy is to see to it that everyone washed into the Gulf of Mexico still manages to pull the lever for Obama...several times, if necessary.

Scott

Obama's Line-by-line Analysis of the Federal Budget

I keep coming back to Obama’s promise to look through the budget “line by line” to find unnecessary spending.

In a budget of whatever it is--$2,800,000,000,000 or something, that’s got to be one hell of a lot of lines. That ought to keep Obama busy reading for at least four years. Well, he can’t get into any mischief with his nose in the books.

Unless he was just lying about all that, of course.

Scott

Sarah Palin, Aristocrat?

"Aristocrat” has become such a pejorative term that I think Sarah Palin would be uncomfortable with it, but she’s definitely a natural.

Maybe politics will finally learn what business has learned a long time ago--there are women who are natural leaders, natural entrepreneurs (entrepreneuses, I guess), natural stars.

Tupperware, Mary Kay, Avon, and Pampered Chef have mined these talents for decades--taking “ordinary housewives” and unleashing their hidden talents. (I was a Pampered Chef “kitchen consultant” for a year and met some truly stellar women who’d come out of nowhere.)

Maybe it’s about time the rest of the world noticed it, too.

Scott

Sarah Palin Grilled by Charlie Gibson on the Economy

I adore Palin; I think she’s the best thing to happen to American politics in a generation. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to has some misgivings about her as President. As VP, though, she’s a treasure.

I also agree that her answer about the economy wasn’t great.
Here’s what I would have said:

“Improve the economy? How about a $750,000,000,000 shot in the arm, starting tomorrow? That’s what we’re paying foreign countries for their oil. Do you think that keeping that money in America would help the economy? If we were paying Americans to drill for American oil and gas, those highly-paid workers would be buying houses, cars, TVs, and other stuff; they’d be eating in restaurants, getting haircuts, going to movies, and buying stock in American companies. In other words, they’d be spending money in America, creating jobs for more Americans. Think that’d help, Charlie? I do, and that’s why I support exploration and production of American energy resources. Let’s start today. Are you with me?”

This isn’t just chatter. Where I live (Fort Worth, Texas), we’re seeing a lot of natural gas exploration. It creates jobs; the workers buy cars here, rent houses here, buy local services. In addition, the lease royalties paid to property owners is like found money (I’m getting some myself). This adds up to our local economy being quite strong, and I’ll take it over more tax-and-spend wasteful government programs any damned day of the week.

Scott

No matter what you call it...

At age 25, you're unemployed.

At 35, you're between jobs.

At 45, you're considering a career change.

At 55, you're semi-retired.

At 65, you're just trying to stretch your Social Security.

But no matter what you call it, it's still that miserable state called "being out of work." And it sucks.

Sarah Palin, American

It's funny how something that's hard to define becomes obvious once you have an appropriate measurement.

Obama, Mr. Speechmaker, all bluster and charm, sounding great but lacking any kind of substance, had a lot of voters uneasy though they didn't know why.

Now they do.

Palin can give speeches - and instantly demonstrates that she is everything Obama is not. Grounded, sincere, funny, relaxed, connected, informed, and committed - not to herself but to her family and her country.

Our democratic process produces an awful lot of lousy politicians. But every now and then...every now and then the clouds part and we see someone who will keep America great.

God, what a moment. "It's morning in America," as someone once said.

Scott